Anti-money laundering (Aml) legislation
Will is • 2 July 2018

Why we need to ask you for information


New Zealand has passed a law called the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (“the AML/CFT Act” for short). The purpose of the law reflects New Zealand’s commitment to the international initiative to counter the impact that criminal activity has on people and economies within the global community.

From 1 July 2018 lawyers must comply with the requirements of the AML/CFT Act and do a number of things to help combat money laundering and terrorist financing. One of those things is called “customer due diligence” where lawyers must obtain and verify information from clients about a range of things.


Customer Due Diligence


Customer due diligence requires a law firm to undertake certain background checks before providing services to clients. In order to comply with the AML/CFT law we need to obtain and verify certain information, including your full name; your date of birth; and your address.

The documents we require to confirm your name and date of birth include:

  • any of a New Zealand Passport; a New Zealand Firearms Licence; or an Overseas Passport (provided it contains the requisite information); OR
  • a New Zealand Driver’s Licence AND a non-photographic identification issued from an independent source (e.g. full birth certificate; bank statement; IRD statement; Super Gold Card); OR
  • an 18+ Card AND a full birth certificate.

The type of documents we require to confirm your address include rates bills, utilities bills, bank statements, or IRD statements.


Other information


If you are seeing us about a company or trust business, we will need information about the company or trust including the people associated with it (such as directors, shareholders, trustees and beneficiaries).

We may also need to ask you for further information (including information confirming the source of funds for a transaction or source of wealth for the company or trust).


If you cannot provide the required information


If we are not able to obtain the required information from you, the law prohibits us from acting for you. We need to ask for the information even if you have been a client of ours for a long time.

Please contact the lawyer who will be undertaking your work, if you have any queries or concerns.

Join our Newsletter

Stay tuned

Contact Us

20 September 2026
He taonga to mokopuna, kia whāngaia, kia tipu, kia rea - a child is a treasure, to be nurtured, to grow, to flourish. A common thing we hear from clients is "I want custody of my children." While most people understand what "custody" means, the reality is that custody is no longer a legal term used in New Zealand family law. In fact, the term was removed from our legislation more than 20 years ago. So, what changed? The Care of Children Act 2004 replaced the old concepts of "custody" and "access" with language that focuses more directly on children's needs and parental responsibilities. Instead of talking about custody, the Family Court now talks about: Day-to-day care (who the child lives with and who looks after them on a daily basis); and Contact (the time a child spends with a parent or other important person when they are not in that person's care). The change was intentional. The law moved away from language that can sound like a child is something to be "owned" or "won" by one parent. What does "day-to-day care" mean? Day-to-day care refers to the practical care of a child, including: Where the child lives; Their daily routine; School attendance; Meals, bedtime, and general supervision; and The everyday decisions involved in raising them. A parent can have: Sole day-to-day care; or Shared day-to-day care arrangements. There is no legal presumption that one parent should have day-to-day care over the other. The Court's focus is always on what is in the child's welfare and best interests. What about "contact"? What many people previously called "access" is now referred to as contact . Contact can take many forms, including: Weekend visits; School holiday time; Telephone calls; Video calls; Supervised contact; or Other arrangements that allow a child to maintain a relationship with an important person. The Court recognises that children generally benefit from having ongoing relationships with both parents, provided doing so is safe and in their best interests. Does this mean I can't say "custody"? Not at all. Many people still use terms like "custody," "shared custody," and "access" in everyday conversation, and most lawyers will understand exactly what you mean. However, if you're involved in Family Court proceedings, you'll hear terms such as: Day-to-day care Contact Guardianship Parenting orders These are the legal concepts that will appear in Court documents and orders. Why does the language matter? The shift away from "custody" reflects a broader change in how New Zealand family law views parenting after separation. Rather than focusing on which parent "gets" the child, the law focuses on: The child's welfare and best interests; Maintaining important relationships; Encouraging parents to work together where possible; and Ensuring children are protected from harm. Ultimately, Family Court decisions are not about determining a "winner" and a "loser." They are about creating arrangements that best support the child's wellbeing. As family lawyers , we offer advice, guidance and representation in family law matters, if you would like assistance or to talk to someone, contact us today. Written by: Eva Leutele
A designed graphic with a photo of Casey Hucker, and her name on a black background with red and white text
14 September 2026
Meet Casey Hucker, Property Law Partner at Willis Legal, dedicated to guiding clients through property law. Contact us for expert legal assistance today!
Close-up of a man's hands typing on a laptop
8 September 2026
The age of AI is rapidly changing many aspects of our lives, however, AI has perils for lay people using it to draft legal documents or obtain legal advice.
Show More